Business Inspections in Slovakia: daňová kontrola, eKasa and How to Survive Them

A Letter in Your Inbox That Changes the Day

Most often it doesn't start with an inspector showing up at your door, but with a letter. Sometimes it's an official notification of the start of a daňová kontrola from Finančná správa — with a list of documents and a deadline to gather them. Sometimes it's quieter: the eKasa system has detected a discrepancy between your declared turnover and your cash register data, and instead of a letter, you get a call asking for an explanation. Both scenarios turn a business owner into the same person — someone who re-reads the message three times at night, trying to understand how serious this really is.

The problem is that at this moment, the reaction is usually either too panicked or too careless. Someone tries to respond immediately on their own and accidentally gives more information than was asked. Someone else decides that the documents are in order, so there's no rush — and misses the deadline within which you could have filed an objection. Both extremes are equally dangerous: an inspection in Slovakia is a formalized procedure with clear deadlines and consequences, not a conversation where you can improvise. A discrepancy in eKasa is the most common trigger that launches much broader interest in your financial statements than seemed likely at the start.

Who Can Arrive to Inspect Your Business

A business in Slovakia falls under the control of several authorities at once, and each one checks its own part of the picture, often independently of the others.

• Finančná správa — the tax and customs administration: controls taxes, DPH reporting, and eKasa cash register data;
• Sociálna poisťovňa — checks social contributions and legal employee registration;
• insurance companies — control the payment of health insurance contributions for employees and the entrepreneur;
• inšpektorát práce — labor inspection: employment contracts, working conditions, and cases of nelegálne zamestnávanie;
• RÚVZ — regional public health office: hygiene and sanitary conditions in food, retail, and services;
• SOI — trade inspection: consumer protection, pricing, terms of sale and service provision.

Each of these authorities operates under its own procedures and own grounds for starting an inspection: a business that passed a Finančná správa inspection smoothly might receive a separate request from inšpektorát práce a few months later — and this isn't a "second wave" of the same inspection, but a completely different procedure with different rules.

Why Inspections Have Become More Noticeable Now

Automated reporting is the main reason why inspections no longer look like a random selection of "who to check this quarter." The eKasa system transmits data about every sale in real time, DPH reports are automatically cross-checked between business partners, and employee data in Sociálna poisťovňa is verified against actual presence at facilities during field inspections. A discrepancy that might have gone unnoticed before is now highlighted by the system automatically — and it's often this that becomes the reason for the first request. The structure of your business and the accounting procedures set up at the startup stage directly affect how "visible" your business will be to such automated systems — more details on this in the section about business in Slovakia.

Miestne zisťovanie and daňová kontrola — These Are Not the Same

Confusion between these two forms of control is one of the most common reasons why an entrepreneur underestimates the situation at the start. Miestne zisťovanie — local fact-finding: a short, often unexpected visit by a representative of the authority to your facility, the purpose of which is to check a specific fact on site, for example, whether a receipt was issued, whether an employee is present, or whether the premises match the declared activity. There's usually no pre-arranged deadline — the inspector can arrive without warning.

Daňová kontrola — a completely different procedure in scale: official, with written notification, a defined subject of inspection, and a list of documents that the entrepreneur must provide. It can last for months and ends with a formal document — protokol — with findings. It's precisely the results of daňová kontrola, not a short miestne zisťovanie, that most often lead to additional tax assessments and financial consequences for the business.

Why a Short Visit Is Dangerous Precisely Because of Its Unexpectedness

The paradox is that it's precisely the short miestne zisťovanie, which seems trivial compared to a full inspection, that most often becomes the catalyst for one. One unissued receipt detected during such a visit, or one employee without a signed employment contract on site — that's already sufficient ground for the authority to expand its attention to your business and launch a full daňová kontrola or a separate inspection from inšpektorát práce. That's why preparation isn't something you do after receiving an official letter: issuing a receipt for every sale, signing a contract for every employee, and having current permits where needed — these are your real protection against a short inspection growing into a major one.

What an Inspector Can Demand and What You Have the Right to Not Show Immediately

The rights of an entrepreneur during an inspection are not abstract theory, but a concrete list of actions. An inspector has the right to demand documents directly related to the subject of the inspection, access to premises, and explanations regarding operations or discrepancies — this is a legal and mandatory part of the procedure. At the same time, an entrepreneur has the right to several things that are often forgotten in moments of stress:

• know the exact subject and grounds for the inspection, rather than guess;
• receive a reasonable deadline for preparing documents, not provide everything "right now" under pressure;
• be present personally or through a representative during all procedural actions;
• receive a copy of the protocol or record of the inspection results;
• submit a vyjadrenie — written objection or explanation — within an established deadline, before the conclusions become final.

Don't confuse "the right not to show immediately" with the right to refuse to provide documents altogether. Documents not directly related to the subject of the inspection don't need to be provided without necessity, and an expansion of the request beyond the initial subject is grounds for a separate legal analysis, not automatic compliance.

A Particularly Sensitive Topic: nelegálne zamestnávanie

An inspection by inšpektorát práce is most often focused precisely on the fact of nelegálne zamestnávanie — a situation where a person actually works at a facility without a signed employment contract or without registration in Sociálna poisťovňa. This is one of the most serious findings in an inspection: the penalties for it differ significantly from ordinary tax additional assessments and affect not only finances but also the reputation of the business. Personnel records should be set up immediately after registering your business, along with basic steps from the company registration checklist.

How to Keep Documents So That an Inspection Doesn't Become a Disaster

The biggest difference between a business that passes an inspection calmly and one that experiences it as a crisis is not the quality of arguments during the inspection itself, but the order built long before it. An inspection doesn't ask for documents you don't yet have in your system; it checks what should have been done on time. The basic minimum that should be current at any moment:

• issued receipts and invoices, synchronized with eKasa, without gaps and technical omissions;
• employment contracts, signed and registered before actual start of work, not backdated;
• contracts with counterparties, confirming the reality of transactions, not just the fact of payment;
• DPH reports, submitted on time and without discrepancies with counterparty data;
• confirmation of odvody payment within established deadlines.

A technical cash register malfunction, an unissued receipt, or late employee registration — minor issues that rarely lead to serious consequences on their own. But when an inspection is already underway, each minor issue becomes a separate point on the list of questions, and it's precisely their accumulation, not one major mistake, that most often forms a negative conclusion in the protokol.

Keeping documents in order is also a question of how your business activity itself is structured from the very beginning: form of registration, method of expense accounting, division of responsibility between the owner and hired employees. These decisions made at the startup stage determine how difficult it will be to keep documentation in order for years to come — this topic is covered in more detail in materials about conducting business abroad.

Protokol and vyjadrenie: Deadlines You Cannot Miss

Any complete daňová kontrola ends with a document — protokol, in which the authority records the facts established, discrepancies found, and preliminary conclusions. This is not a final decision on sanctions, but an intermediate stage, and this is exactly where an entrepreneur has a legal right to respond — to submit a vyjadrenie, a written explanation or objection to the facts stated in the protocol, within an established deadline. This deadline is one of the most important moments in the entire procedure and at the same time one of the most often underestimated: a missed deadline means that the protocol's conclusions effectively become the basis for the authority's further decision without taking your position into account, even if it's well-founded.

Why the Text of vyjadrenie Is Legal Work, Not Accounting Work

Writing a vyjadrenie is not enough to simply "explain in your own words what happened." Wording must account for how each phrase might be read by the authority and which details only expand the scope of the inspector's attention. An accountant knows the numbers well, but formulating a legal position that protects the business is already the territory of a lawyer and attorney. The most common mistake: the owner tries to write vyjadrenie themselves "to save money on a lawyer for just one letter" and ends up either admitting more than necessary or formulating a position so unclearly that it has no legal weight.

If you already have a letter about an inspection or a protocol in your hands and you're not sure how much time is left to respond, a sensible first step is a quick consultation that lets you assess the situation before you write a single word to the authority.

Who Tracks the Numbers and Who Responds to the Protocol

Confusion between the role of an accountant and the role of a lawyer is the main reason why inspections in Slovakia cost a business more than they could. An účtovník handles current accounting: records transactions, prepares DPH reports, watches submission deadlines and synchronizes eKasa data — necessary daily work without which a business cannot operate legally. But accounting is not the same as defending your business's position before a controlling authority, and expecting this from an accountant is a mistake that costs time precisely when you have the least of it.

At Dorosh & Partners, a business receives accounting and legal support in one integrated service, and it's this model of interaction that makes the combination truly useful. You explain the situation to a lawyer in simple words — the way you'd tell a friend: a letter arrived, an inspector asked something during a visit, a discrepancy was found in a DPH report. The lawyer translates this into a legally precise picture, formulates the task for an attorney, directs the work to where the real need is, not where the authority's first request formally pointed — and controls the process until the case is closed.

How Roles Are Divided in Practice

• the accountant tracks daily accounting monthly, synchronizes cash register data, prepares DPH reports, and watches deadlines;
• the lawyer is your first point of contact: receives the situation in plain language and builds a legal picture of the case before an attorney even gets involved;
• the attorney prepares or reviews vyjadrenie, communicates with Finančná správa, Sociálna poisťovňa, or inšpektorát práce, and represents your business's position;
• the lawyer oversees the quality and timeliness of every step the attorney takes, ensuring that each response aligns with your actual situation.

Such support doesn't duplicate the accountant's work or replace them — it closes precisely the gap that most often costs a business the most: the moment when accounting skills are no longer enough, and the owner is left alone facing a controlling authority. Ongoing legal support means that by the time you receive a letter about an inspection, the team already knows your business structure, rather than studying it from scratch under time pressure — especially important for a newly registered business still forming its internal procedures; more details on the first steps are in the section about working in Slovakia. We don't promise a specific inspection result — no responsible lawyer makes that promise — but we do guarantee that every step in your response is legally justified, submitted on time, and formulated to protect your business's interests.

Questions People Ask Most Often

Can I refuse an inspector's visit without warning?

No, if it's a legitimate miestne zisťovanie within the authority's powers. But you have the right to ask for official ID and clarify the purpose of the visit — this is a legal requirement that helps you understand what you're dealing with.

How much time do I have to submit vyjadrenie after receiving protokol?

The deadline is set in the protocol itself and is counted from the date of receipt. The specific duration depends on the type of procedure, so the first step is always to check the exact date in your document, not rely on timelines from someone else's case.

Do I need an attorney if the documents are actually in order?

Yes, and support is often most effective precisely then: when your business's position is strong, a properly formulated response can close an inspection quickly. A weak or late response, even with the right documents, can turn a simple inspection into a lengthy procedure.

What happens if nelegálne zamestnávanie is discovered by chance?

This is one of the most serious findings during an inspection, and the consequences are usually more significant than with ordinary accounting discrepancies. The extent depends on the specific circumstances, so it's important to get a legal assessment as quickly as possible, not try to handle the question on your own.

An inspection of a business in Slovakia rarely becomes a disaster simply because it starts — it becomes a disaster because of unpreparedness and missed deadlines. Order in your documents, a clear division of roles between accountant and lawyer, and a quick, legally sound response to the first letter determine whether an inspection ends in explanation or turns into a lengthy, costly affair.

Матеріал має інформаційний характер і не замінює юридичну консультацію.